[JDEV] Naming of Jabber-Packages

[Thomas Muldowney]

On the centericq problem... Why was it requested that I create an entire
account when it just needs an offsite link?

To the other comments.  I implemented the "Active Projects" sidebar
recently and it will roll out with our next big update.  That update
will also include localized language support, multiple entries for
platforms, licenses and programming languages, and many work flow
enhancements.  We're also still working hard on the complete jabber
integration.  I expect that to be done before the end of Jan.

--temas


On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 12:15:04PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 06:24:41PM +0100, Rico -mc- Gloeckner wrote:
> 
> > My aim was rather, that it should get into an usable state, or from my
> > point of view, that _something_ happens on the codebase within a
> > certain amount of time.
> 
> I guess I'm nitpicking, but it would appear to be more accurate that you
> would like _something visible_ to happen with the codebase.  Just
> because an update hasn't been made in months doesn't mean the project is
> dead.  Perhaps there's just been nothing to release?  Or, perhaps you're
> not looking at the official site for the project (see below).
> 
> > When particulary looking at pJab (private Jabber, not perl Jabber
> > Client), i noticed that the Project was created one month ago and:
> >  - the CVS is empty
> >  - the Files Section is empty
> >  - the TODO Section is empty
> >  - the the Bugs Section is empty
> >  ...
> > This leads me to the Conclusion that the Guy who added that Project is
> > not interested in it anymore - i might be wrong tho.
> 
> Well, lets take a look at another project listed there:
> 
> centericq -
> - project was created a bit over a month ago
> - no files
> - no cvs
> - bugs section is empty
> - tasks section is empty
> 
> By the above criteria centericq would be considered a dead project.
> However, I'm sure the developer(s) and user(s) wouldn't agree.
> 
> The official web site would appear to be:
>    http://konst.org.ua/centericq/
> 
> 
> > I brought this up on this Mailinglist because i hoped that People
> > actually cared and discussed further what can be done better.
> 
> I do actually care, would not have responded if I didn't.  The problem
> is this is an entirely subjective item.
> 
> -- 
> Jamin W. Collins
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.jabber.org/jdev/attachments/20021231/20a07d7c/attachment-0002.pgp>