[JDEV] license?

[Scott Robinson]

According to opensource.org, we can be considered an OSI project. I'll do a
bit more checking around, but as far as I am concerned, since my input,
suggestions, architecture changes, and various ideas I have put forward have
been discussed and in some cases implemented, I believe this is open source
enough for me.

Scott.

* Robert Thompson translated into ASCII [Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 10:32:20PM -0400][<007201bf0247$331a2bf0$65390a18 at roalok1.mi.home.com>]
> This is a great point.
> 
> I don't want to get involved in something that is not a standard open
> effort.
> 
> If there is not a true License Published then there are no guarantees
> regardless if there is a published "team effort".
> 
> Could someone who has experience with open efforts shed some light on if
> this Jabber effort is adhering to the standard open source methods?
> 
> I don't say this to pun the team in any way -- I'm very excited about
> this -- but on the other hand, I've learned to be careful these days.
> 
> - Robert
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Simply Hao <hao at netaxs.com>
> To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 1999 9:59 PM
> Subject: [JDEV] license?
> 
> 
> > Where is the open source license?  Is there one, or are we just
> > assuming certain things?
> >
> > -Hao
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>