[jdev] Checking the from of iq replies

[Lars Noschinski]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Thijs,

On 04.03.2014 11:36, Thijs Alkemade wrote:
> On 4 mrt. 2014, at 10:24, Lars Noschinski
> <lars at public.noschinski.de

>>> Legend e: empty l: local (client) jid bl: bare local jid dl: 
>>> domainpart of local jid s: server jid o: other jid


> The changes to Pidgin were proposed for the situations where to=e
> and from=l/dl/s, because those are used by a number of (broken)
> servers out there. I have not seen it necessary to look at the
> other possiblities in your table,

I agree that your choices for Pidgin look sensible.

> except for to=l from=e, which is empty in your table, but should be
> allowed (I've submitted a new patch to Pidgin for this, but it
> hasn't been accepted yet).

Do you mean l or bl here? From your rule below, I guess you meant bl?

Have you seen this combination in the wild? Or is this an instance of
'be liberal in what you receive'?

> So I think it makes sense to add the rule: "if you do use an
> explicit JID, that's not your own bare JID, the reply must match
> exactly".

  -- Lars
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTFbQ9AAoJEOUX5T7UhMS6sjAIAIjb8p7EYtT5vhbDNEARhj2J
PCzUTw1qORjVg4wZ6fM4sBQCC0u7F/A503XwLjPlNQZcGmphS6lR6/3IRxnI6PFp
navWTNF68gE39YVGcmPtgZ+9KqyC4SFM94eOeWLg/Cv+Pr2Nj6WL8mtHfrGv99/6
63lBY+RJUJT3nVIHlZyD5ETW7NQPg/EiGvXsDxhtTAZxwRK8lT7+kinZMST+GwVV
sbRjnlvrciZazQAvOmA1KVjT49759XKMuwAouNGRbiQZ1kxLos731xq2wHmfVu55
8Zo6WXAnPMDKElxJSLywjfWz61Rg2jTSJ2ZDezcJ6hWmewCWoWklLliG4DGq/hE=
=OJij
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----