[jdev] Feedback on the Notifixious PubSub API

Sat Nov 8 11:35:11 CST 2008

Hi Nathan,
Thanks for the feedback!
Not sure I get your comments though :( users can subscribe with both a
resource or bare JID. In the end we "strip" the resource and subscribe the
bare JID.
Whe you say "normal" consumer, do you actually mean "normal" client? If so,
yes, our API wasn't meant to be used with regular Jabber client (Gajim,
PSI), since our approach is clearly to promote PubSub. However, if a user
still wants to use his "normal" jabber account, he can still subscribe with
what we call a "jabber" account (like he would do with gtalk for example).
Maybe this is not clear, but we have 2 different things :
- Jabber account (like gatlk) : can be used by normal clients..
- XMPP API (Pubsub) : can be used by devs to create their own channels that
users can then use.

Thanks again for the feedback though!

--
Julien Genestoux
http://www.ouvre-boite.com
http://blog.notifixio.us

+1 (415) 254 7340
+33 (0)9 70 44 76 29

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Nathan Fritz <nathanfritz at gmail.com> wrote:

> According to your example, you seem to suggest subscribing with a resource
> and not a bare jid, which makes sense depending on the type of consumer.
> Also, your updates do not include a <body /> and thus a "normal" consumer
> wouldn't get much use out of this.  So, if your target audience is
> specialized consumers, this looks great!  Otherwise, I have several
> suggestions.
>
> _______________________________________________
> JDev mailing list
> FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq
> Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20
> Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
> Unsubscribe: JDev-unsubscribe at jabber.org
> _______________________________________________
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.jabber.org/jdev/attachments/20081108/43f24ba9/attachment-0003.htm>