[jdev] Question about resource binding to server implementors

[Philipp Hancke]

Peter Saint-Andre schrieb:
> I can't remember why we even thought about allowing a client to bind
connection-timeout magic which pings the conflicting active resource
and hopes for a timeout before session binding happens possibly?


> multiple resources with the same identifier, since it would play havoc
> with delivery logic. 
session binding in xmpp-im does not allow that anyway.
"If there is already an active resource of the same name, the server
  MUST either..."

> Sounds to me like a clean-up item for rfc3920bis.
and 3921bis, as catching resource conflicts during resource
bind implies that this conflict can no longer happen in
session establishment.