[jdev] Re: discovering extensions without disco

[Peter Saint-Andre]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Trejkaz wrote:
> On Thursday 06 April 2006 02:11, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Remko Troncon wrote:
>>> we should make simple iq-based protocol for blocking and going
>>> invisible, as a server-side profile of privacy lists.
>> Yes, that's probably a good idea. Could be done with JEP-0050 I guess.
> 
> Would it be possible to do this by adding convention on top of JEP-0126 
> instead of defining a new command-based protocol?  If we assume that a server 
> will auto-create the groups called "invisible" and "visible", then most of 
> the complexity for privacy lists go away.  

Ah, that probably makes more sense, eh?

> There is no recommended group name 
> for "visible-to-from" in the implementation notes, but surely this could be 
> added too.

What is the point of hardcoding visible-to-from rule? AFAICS, that is no
different from the visible rule (since you send presence only to people
who have subscribed to you). But perhaps I'm missing something. :-)

P

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEND7zNF1RSzyt3NURAqidAKC7r2erTK1pnnzUHEmPXYQX5B3wigCcDR2T
ph2W6CAU9dTqETlZenN39Kk=
=K1fn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://www.jabber.org/jdev/attachments/20060405/6486dff9/attachment-0002.bin>