[jdev] Re: discovering extensions without disco

[Trejkaz]

On Thursday 06 April 2006 02:11, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Remko Troncon wrote:
> > we should make simple iq-based protocol for blocking and going
> > invisible, as a server-side profile of privacy lists.
>
> Yes, that's probably a good idea. Could be done with JEP-0050 I guess.

Would it be possible to do this by adding convention on top of JEP-0126 
instead of defining a new command-based protocol?  If we assume that a server 
will auto-create the groups called "invisible" and "visible", then most of 
the complexity for privacy lists go away.  There is no recommended group name 
for "visible-to-from" in the implementation notes, but surely this could be 
added too.

TX

-- 
             Email: trejkaz at trypticon.org
         Jabber ID: trejkaz at trypticon.org
          Web site: http://trypticon.org/
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.jabber.org/jdev/attachments/20060406/66b780d1/attachment-0002.pgp>