Re(2): [JDEV] MUC problems

Wed Feb 12 16:58:00 CST 2003

Hello,

I think this might open the path for a special kind of abuse: persons acting offensive because they want the room to become non-anonymous.

Like with any "crime", the offender is the only one who must receive punishment. The innocents must be protected and, in this case, their right to anonymity must be protected too.

Just my 2 cents.

Best regards,
Sebastian

Vapor  (2/13/2003  12:04 AM):
>What about having anonymous rooms that an admin can change to non-anonymous.
>When the change is made, all participants in the room are given the option
>to leave or have their JID revealed to the administrators. [...]
>This could then offer those abusing the oportunity to be revealed or leave
>on their own without necessarily being revealed.
>
>Just a thought.
>Vapor