R: [JDEV] code libraries

[aliban at gmx.net]

I don´t think this is a good idea...
In fact each coder is always convinced that his code is 
beta/alpha/released... whatever other ppl would call it different (for 
example all ppl are using alpha/beta icq clients and that is their 
released product)

I personally prefere plain descriptions, meaning: how many 
dependencies, environment (OS, c++/vb), license, url, project time.

cya, Edrin

> We should probably add also another column specifying the "completeness" of
> the component, either textual (alpha, beta, release candidate, reliable for
> production environment), or a % value. Of course these would have to be
> submitted by the author, who will take his responsibility :-) for telling
> the truth!!!