[JDEV] question on scm
Thomas Muldowney
temas at box5.net
Fri Mar 8 13:47:05 CST 2002
Did you really configure the jabberd to accept scm on port 5222 with the
password guess? Seems unlikely to me. Check the README for
configuration.
--temas
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 12:46, Dong Yan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed a Jabberd router (open source 1.4.2) on my linux machine
> (redhat 7.2). I
> download scm and installed in the same machine.
> I first started the jabberd, then I tried to start scm by typing:
> ./scm 127.0.0.1 5222 1 scm guess
> then I received the following error messages:
> Router connection in error -- exiting
> scm: Application.cpp:93: static void
> bedrock::Application::stop(int, const std::string&): Assertion
> '_app_instance_started == true' failed.
>
> Any suggestions on how to fix it?
>
> Thanks,
> Don
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdev-request at jabber.org [mailto:jdev-request at jabber.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:44 AM
> To: jdev at jabber.org
> Subject: jdev digest, Vol 1 #1297 - 11 msgs
>
>
> Send jdev mailing list submissions to
> jdev at jabber.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> jdev-request at jabber.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> jdev-admin at jabber.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of jdev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Jabber Transports - New Architecture (Peter Saint-Andre)
> 2. Re: Yahoo With Jabber (Peter Saint-Andre)
> 3. Re: jabberd and Proxies (Dave)
> 4. RE: Yahoo With Jabber (Riyaad Miller)
> 5. Re: Jabber Transports - New Architecture (James Widman)
> 6. Re: Yahoo With Jabber (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Rodrigo_Borrego_Bernab=E9?=)
> 7. JECL and Address resolution (Piers Harding)
> 8. Re: question on running ECHO component (Piers Harding)
> 9. Re: jabberd and Proxies (Richard Dobson)
> 10. RE: Docs on the XDB element ?
> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?=)
> 11. RE: jabberd and Proxies : leave AOL alone
> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?=)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 22:40:17 -0600 (CST)
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org>
> To: jdev at jabber.org
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Jabber Transports - New Architecture
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> On 7 Mar 2002, Julian Missig wrote:
>
> > The transports were created to ease the transition to Jabber.
>
> This to me is the most interesting point. What *else* can we do to ease
> the transition? Given the recent changes by Yahoo and the fact that MSN
> could change its protocol tomorrow on a whim (I won't even mention AOL), I
> feel it's becoming obvious that the only way Jabber will have any impact
> in the IM world is to grow fast enough and big enough that other IM
> systems have to sit up and take notice. So what do we need to do in order
> to grow that fast and become that ubiquitous?
>
> Here's a short list:
>
> 1. Killer clients for Windows and Mac (face it, not everyone runs Linux ;)
>
> 2. Easier server administration to penetrate more organizations and ISPs
>
> 3. Windows server (see points 1 and 2)
>
> 4. Even better security
>
> 5. Reliable file transfers
>
> 6. Other popular features (even emoticon images, much as I dislike 'em)
>
> I know people want immediate gratification and interoperability now, but I
> say screw the transports -- let's build a truly open IM network, not spend
> our precious energy hacking up gateways to closed systems.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> email+jabber: stpeter at jabber.org
> weblog: http://www.saint-andre.com/blog/
>
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 22:42:02 -0600 (CST)
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org>
> To: "jdev at jabber.org" <jdev at jabber.org>
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Yahoo With Jabber
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> > Matthias Wimmer was kind enough to update the Yahoo tranport, which
> > appears to be abandoned (sorry if I am wrong about this and offended
> > the maintainer, but I have not noticed any updates in awhile).
>
> Yes, it is abandoned.
>
> Peter
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 00:04:34 -0500 (EST)
> From: Dave <dave at dave.tj>
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> To: jdev at jabber.org
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> If you control your firewall, that's great. If you're behind AOL's proxy,
> though, you really need a crutch if you want to be able to run your own
> server ;-)
>
> - Dave
>
>
> Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> >
> > I disagree. Jabber is another service that firewall admins should deal
> > with appropiately. Tunnelling is a crutch and abuse of a good firewall
> > setup, and I think should be avoided.
> >
> > --temas
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:43, Dave wrote:
> > > Maybe we should set up some sort of HTTP-based s2s protocol? That'll
> > > allow servers to talk to each other even when they're behind firewalls.
> > > (HTTP-based c2s already exists.)
> > >
> > > Dave Cohen
> > >
> > >
> > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?= wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The answer is : NO
> > > >
> > > > And a proxy would only allow outgoing connection (yourServer ->
> > > > jabber.org:5269) but not the incoming one (jabber.org ->
> yourServer:5269)
> > > > s2s needs 2 simultanous TCP connection to work...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernabé [mailto:rb20 at tid.es]
> > > > Envoyé : mercredi 6 mars 2002 15:06
> > > > À : jdev at jabber.org
> > > > Objet : Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I can't open that port.
> > > > So there is no way to say a jabber server it should use a proxy (maybe
> with
> > > > a tag in s2s description)?
> > > >
> > > > TIA
> > > > Rodrigo
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Riviere Stéphane Jean" <Stephane.SR.Riviere at atosorigin.com>
> > > > To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:01 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't know if this has changed with the 1.4.2 server but it wasn't
> > > > possible with the 1.4.1.
> > > > You have to open the 5269 port on your firewall to enable s2s
> > > > communication...
> > > >
> > > > Stéphane.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernabé [mailto:rb20 at tid.es]
> > > > Envoyé : mercredi 6 mars 2002 12:11
> > > > À : jdev at jabber.org
> > > > Objet : [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Can a jabberd server work through a Proxy?
> > > > I mean, I have my server compiled and working. Clients can connect,
> users
> > > > can talk (only users connected directly to my server), etc.
> > > >
> > > > But the server cannot find jabber.org. And it's because there's a
> proxy
> > > > between my server and the Internet.
> > > > Could anybody help me? Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Rodri
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Subject: RE: [JDEV] Yahoo With Jabber
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:00:49 +0200
> From: "Riyaad Miller" <RMiller at mweb.com>
> To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> I've actually triedusing the transport mentioned is the link below
> ...followed the setup and readme and all
> No such luck .... :-(
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Porter [mailto:matthew at linjafoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:54 PM
> To: jdev at jabber.org
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Yahoo With Jabber
>
>
> Ajay:
> I would try using the Yahoo! transport available at
> http://amessage.de/patches/ rather than the one on the Jabber websites.
> Matthias Wimmer was kind enough to update the Yahoo tranport, which
> appears to be abandoned (sorry if I am wrong about this and offended
> the maintainer, but I have not noticed any updates in awhile).
>
>
>
> -matthew porter
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Ajay Garg wrote:
>
> > i did whatever is wriiten on the website but i am still not able to
> > make Yahoo work with my Jabber Server. Can someone please help me. I
> > can send the Jabber log if required.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Ajay
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
> > http://mail.yahoo.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
> Give your child an unfair advantage with M-Web Learning. To join, call
> 08600 32 000 or go to http://join.mweb.co.za
>
> M-Web – just like that
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 01:08:28 -0600
> From: James Widman <j-widman at cornellcollege.edu>
> To: jdev at jabber.org
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Jabber Transports - New Architecture
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> /me nods to the three previous replies.
>
> The concept of null clients also gets raised during conversations like
> this. That's a nice idea too, but not really necessary.
>
> This is all you have to do:
>
> 1) If jabberd and the transports you want aren't known to work on your
> platform, port them.
> 2) Configure jabberd so that the server's host name is localhost, and
> transports are running at aim.localhost, msn.localhost, etc.
> (I tested this part out and it works for me; contrary to the *current*
> server howto, you don't need a Fully Qualified Domain Name to get
> transport services like aim-t and msn-t working; you just need the
> client to be on the same machine as the server if it's not an FQDN).
> 3) Use your client to log into localhost and register with the
> transports from there.
>
> The drawback here is that you at localhost cannot send messages to
> me at jabber.org. However, one feature that's been requested for clients
> is the ability to be logged into multiple jabber accounts
> simultaneously. As time goes on, this will probably become a pretty
> common feature, especially as jabber becomes more popular and more
> people request it (actually, if it's ok with Julian, and if enough
> people email me in support of it, I'd be happy to work this into
> Gabber). If and when it becomes a common feature, it could make a lot
> of sense to put together a jabberd package which is optimized for use by
> a small number of users and comes with the most popular inter-IM system
> transports. Would that help to ease the transition for end users?
>
> There's only one problem I can spot with a configuration like this:
> the roster info for the localhost account will not follow you around
> from one device to another. The user would have to manually do an
> export/import. But there might be a clean way around this (if we're
> going to have multiple accounts managed by one client, we might want a
> clean way to store roster info on what the user designates as a
> "primary" account anyway -- but *please* correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> --James
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rodrigo_Borrego_Bernab=E9?= <rb20 at tid.es>
> To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Yahoo With Jabber
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:40:34 +0100
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> Thank you and Peter for your help.
>
> Rodri
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Riviere Stéphane Jean" <Stephane.SR.Riviere at atosorigin.com>
> --- For libyahoo : [...]
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 07:57:42 +0000
> From: Piers Harding <piers at ompa.net>
> To: jdev at jabber.org
> Subject: [JDEV] JECL and Address resolution
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have just upgraded to the latest version of the JECL ( as found on
> jabberstudio ), and noticed something different about how it opperates.
>
> Previous I used to be able to use the name "localhost" for the server that
> my components connected to, but now I am forced to use the IP address
> 127.0.0.1. I have traced this down to the Address Resolution phase in
> bedrock Socket.cpp ( approx. line 123 ).
>
> - I'm using RH7.2 gcc3.0.1.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Piers Harding.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 08:00:16 +0000
> From: Piers Harding <piers at ompa.net>
> To: jdev at jabber.org
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] question on running ECHO component
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> Hi - what is your build platform and where did you get your JECL source from
> ( jabberstudio or tigris.jabber.org ) ?
>
> Cheers.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 02:35:25PM -0800, Dong Yan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am new at Jabber and really appreciate your help. I installed a Jabber
> > router in my linux machine and installed an echo program (as an
> application,
> > example of JECL) in the same machine.
> >
> > When I run the echo program, I always get the following message,
> >
> > Router error occurred.
> > Router is now connected.
> > Router is now disconnected.
> >
> > It seems to me something is wrong because of the error message at the
> > first line. Any suggestions on how to fix it?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Don
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> From: "Richard Dobson" <richard at dobson-i.net>
> To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:13:15 -0000
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> Well if you are using an AOL dialup connection to host a jabber server then
> I think you have much greater problems to deal with anyway, also there is a
> reason ISP's use such measures, so they can stop people hosting servers on
> their connections when they shouldnt be in the first place, if you want to
> host a server in such a situation change to an ISP that does not have the
> aformentioned proxy servers.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave" <dave at dave.tj>
> To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
>
>
> > If you control your firewall, that's great. If you're behind AOL's proxy,
> > though, you really need a crutch if you want to be able to run your own
> > server ;-)
> >
> > - Dave
> >
> >
> > Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> > >
> > > I disagree. Jabber is another service that firewall admins should deal
> > > with appropiately. Tunnelling is a crutch and abuse of a good firewall
> > > setup, and I think should be avoided.
> > >
> > > --temas
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:43, Dave wrote:
> > > > Maybe we should set up some sort of HTTP-based s2s protocol? That'll
> > > > allow servers to talk to each other even when they're behind
> firewalls.
> > > > (HTTP-based c2s already exists.)
> > > >
> > > > Dave Cohen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?= wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The answer is : NO
> > > > >
> > > > > And a proxy would only allow outgoing connection (yourServer ->
> > > > > jabber.org:5269) but not the incoming one (jabber.org ->
> yourServer:5269)
> > > > > s2s needs 2 simultanous TCP connection to work...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernabé [mailto:rb20 at tid.es]
> > > > > Envoyé : mercredi 6 mars 2002 15:06
> > > > > À : jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > Objet : Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't open that port.
> > > > > So there is no way to say a jabber server it should use a proxy
> (maybe with
> > > > > a tag in s2s description)?
> > > > >
> > > > > TIA
> > > > > Rodrigo
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Riviere Stéphane Jean" <Stephane.SR.Riviere at atosorigin.com>
> > > > > To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:01 PM
> > > > > Subject: RE: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know if this has changed with the 1.4.2 server but it wasn't
> > > > > possible with the 1.4.1.
> > > > > You have to open the 5269 port on your firewall to enable s2s
> > > > > communication...
> > > > >
> > > > > Stéphane.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernabé [mailto:rb20 at tid.es]
> > > > > Envoyé : mercredi 6 mars 2002 12:11
> > > > > À : jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > Objet : [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Can a jabberd server work through a Proxy?
> > > > > I mean, I have my server compiled and working. Clients can connect,
> users
> > > > > can talk (only users connected directly to my server), etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > But the server cannot find jabber.org. And it's because there's a
> proxy
> > > > > between my server and the Internet.
> > > > > Could anybody help me? Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rodri
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?=
> <Stephane.SR.Riviere at atosorigin.com>
> To: "'jdev at jabber.org'" <jdev at jabber.org>
> Subject: RE: [JDEV] Docs on the XDB element ?
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:26:15 +0100
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> Thanks,
>
> If anyone else is interested, I've written a working accept component using
> Launcher.java.
>
> I had to make some changes to make the thing work...
> -> modify the main() of the Launcher to initialize all the launcher
> properties
> -> correct a few bugs in the ConnectionBean (pb with the
> DisableAutoHeader...)
>
> If others are interested, we can discuss of that here, but I think this
> should be discussed OOB, to not disturb C developers with Java problems ;-)
>
>
> Stephane.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------
> email : Stephane.sr.Riviere at atosorigin.com
> tél : (0)3.20.60.77.14
>
> Ingénieur R&D
> Equipe Grands Projets
> Direction Recherche & Développement
> ATOS ORIGIN Activité Multimédia
> http://www.atosorigin.com
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : philippe.raxhon at mrlinternational.com
> [mailto:philippe.raxhon at mrlinternational.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 7 mars 2002 20:38
> À : jdev at jabber.org
> Objet : Re: [JDEV] Docs on the XDB element ?
>
>
> You should take a look at the slides DJ Adams has posted from his talk at
> FOSDEM.
>
> http://www.pipetree.com/~dj/fosdem2002/
>
> I'm also playing with java component based on jabberbeans. Did you try to
> write an accept component based on Launcher.java? It's not working for me
> but I'm about to fix that.
>
> Philippe Raxhon
> raxhonp at iname.com
>
> Riviere Stéphane Jean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently developing external server components (in Java) and need
> to
> store/retrieve some information about the component, registered
> clients....
>
> This can be done using the <XBD/> element, but I didn't find much
> information but this :
> http://docs.jabber.org/general/html/component-intro.html
>
> Does further documentation about XDB exist or will I have to make
> personal
> tests to find how it works ?
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Stéphane.
>
>
> [ For those who are interested on my configuration :
> - jabberd 1.4.1 with Conferencing / JUD / MSN Transport / Weather
> service
> ;-)
> - server is an old P2 300MHz / 92MB RAM running a RedHat 6.2
> - external components are developed in Java with jabberbeans latest
> CVS
> sources
> ]
>
> ------------------------------------------
> email : Stephane.sr.Riviere at atosorigin.com
> tél : (0)3.20.60.77.14
>
> Ingénieur R&D
> Equipe Grands Projets
> Direction Recherche & Développement
> ATOS ORIGIN Activité Multimédia
> http://www.atosorigin.com
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?=
> <Stephane.SR.Riviere at atosorigin.com>
> To: "'jdev at jabber.org'" <jdev at jabber.org>
> Subject: RE: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies : leave AOL alone
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:37:28 +0100
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> It's probably not the rigt place to deal about that, but can AOL call itself
> an ISP ? What they offers is an access to the web (==port 80), not to the
> whole Internet, all their other services are proprietary solutions....
>
> So, if AOL is your provider, forget about all the wonderful things the
> Internet can offer...
>
>
> If you find Jabber great and have AOL as ISP, the only thing to do is find
> another ISP !
> I think that losing clients is the only thing that can make AOL understand
> that their proprietary policy is not the right one...
>
>
>
> Stephane.
>
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Richard Dobson [mailto:richard at dobson-i.net]
> Envoyé : vendredi 8 mars 2002 10:13
> À : jdev at jabber.org
> Objet : Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
>
>
> Well if you are using an AOL dialup connection to host a jabber server then
> I think you have much greater problems to deal with anyway, also there is a
> reason ISP's use such measures, so they can stop people hosting servers on
> their connections when they shouldnt be in the first place, if you want to
> host a server in such a situation change to an ISP that does not have the
> aformentioned proxy servers.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave" <dave at dave.tj>
> To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
>
>
> > If you control your firewall, that's great. If you're behind AOL's proxy,
> > though, you really need a crutch if you want to be able to run your own
> > server ;-)
> >
> > - Dave
> >
> >
> > Thomas Muldowney wrote:
> > >
> > > I disagree. Jabber is another service that firewall admins should deal
> > > with appropiately. Tunnelling is a crutch and abuse of a good firewall
> > > setup, and I think should be avoided.
> > >
> > > --temas
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 14:43, Dave wrote:
> > > > Maybe we should set up some sort of HTTP-based s2s protocol? That'll
> > > > allow servers to talk to each other even when they're behind
> firewalls.
> > > > (HTTP-based c2s already exists.)
> > > >
> > > > Dave Cohen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Riviere_St=E9phane_Jean?= wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The answer is : NO
> > > > >
> > > > > And a proxy would only allow outgoing connection (yourServer ->
> > > > > jabber.org:5269) but not the incoming one (jabber.org ->
> yourServer:5269)
> > > > > s2s needs 2 simultanous TCP connection to work...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernabé [mailto:rb20 at tid.es]
> > > > > Envoyé : mercredi 6 mars 2002 15:06
> > > > > À : jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > Objet : Re: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't open that port.
> > > > > So there is no way to say a jabber server it should use a proxy
> (maybe with
> > > > > a tag in s2s description)?
> > > > >
> > > > > TIA
> > > > > Rodrigo
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Riviere Stéphane Jean" <Stephane.SR.Riviere at atosorigin.com>
> > > > > To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:01 PM
> > > > > Subject: RE: [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know if this has changed with the 1.4.2 server but it wasn't
> > > > > possible with the 1.4.1.
> > > > > You have to open the 5269 port on your firewall to enable s2s
> > > > > communication...
> > > > >
> > > > > Stéphane.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > > De : Rodrigo Borrego Bernabé [mailto:rb20 at tid.es]
> > > > > Envoyé : mercredi 6 mars 2002 12:11
> > > > > À : jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > Objet : [JDEV] jabberd and Proxies
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Can a jabberd server work through a Proxy?
> > > > > I mean, I have my server compiled and working. Clients can connect,
> users
> > > > > can talk (only users connected directly to my server), etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > But the server cannot find jabber.org. And it's because there's a
> proxy
> > > > > between my server and the Internet.
> > > > > Could anybody help me? Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Rodri
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>
>
> End of jdev Digest
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
More information about the JDev
mailing list