[JDEV] Invisibility and transports

[Jim Seymour]

Thomas Muldowney <temas at box5.net> wrote:
> 
> I'm remembering old conversations about this now, and the problem was
> that everything is just a JID and distinguishing tranports is a non
> trivial task (because they could be remote).  
[snip]

Reading this and the other follow-ups, it sounds like the only solution
to this problem, for now, is that instead of sending a presence type
invisible to the server, send it to each individual JID?  Seems kind of
abusive to the server...

Thanks, everybody, for the follow-ups.


Regards,
Jim
-- 
Jim Seymour                  | PGP Public Key available at:
jseymour at LinxNet.com         | http://www.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html
http://jimsun.LinxNet.com    |