[JDEV] Naming of Jabber-Packages
Rico -mc- Gloeckner
jdev at ukeer.de
Tue Dec 31 11:24:41 CST 2002
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 10:46:04AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> And what gauge would be used to determine if the project "really will be
> done"? Is a project with frequent version changes any better than a
> project with few version changes? What if a project doesn't have a
> release version for several months, is it to be considered dead and not
> worth hosting?
Excuse my wrong expression of what i was trying to say, iam neither
native nor fluent english speaker.
My Aim of the Expression "will be done" was not, that it will be
finished - Programs are never finished.
My aim was rather, that it should get into an usable state, or from my
point of view, that _something_ happens on the codebase within a certain
amount of time.
When particulary looking at pJab (private Jabber, not perl Jabber
Client), i noticed that the Project was created one month ago and:
- the CVS is empty
- the Files Section is empty
- the TODO Section is empty
- the the Bugs Section is empty
...
This leads me to the Conclusion that the Guy who added that Project is
not interested in it anymore - i might be wrong tho.
However, iam also happy with suggestions made by other Posters, i do not
expect my suggestions to be final or THAT Solution which solves
everything.
I brought this up on this Mailinglist because i hoped that People
actually cared and discussed further what can be done better.
regards,
--
| Rico -mc- Gloeckner
| mv ~/.signature `finger mc at ukeer.de`
More information about the JDev
mailing list