[JDEV] conference room creation with MUC

[David Sutton]

Hi all,

  Ok, there might be an issue with one of the dependancies of MU-C. I'm
  currently working on coding a replacement, so watch this space.

Regards,

  David

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:53:18PM -0000, Rob Davis wrote:
> 
> Hi David
> 
> How is the MUC fix coming along?
> 
> Here's the version info FYI (sorry about the delay - reasons beyond my
> control):
> 
> gcc-2.95.3-1c1r4
> libc-5.3.12-31
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Rob
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Sutton" <jabber at dsutton.legend.uk.com>
> To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 5:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] conference room creation with MUC
> 
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> >   I am looking into this whenever I can find a moment - i'm just also
> trying to
> > fix another issue with MU-Conference at the same time.
> >
> >   Call for Information:
> >
> >      Can people let me know what version of GCC and Libc that they
> compiled
> >      MU-Conference with? I'm testing a theory. Please let me know how
> the
> >      code is behaving.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >   David
> >
> > Quoting Rob Davis <lists at solarismedia.co.uk>:
> > >
> > > OK - I've written a room config form parser and here's where i've
> now
> > > got up to:
> > >
> > > If I create the room by sending presence to it (as with the original
> > > group chat protocol) and then request the config form by <iq> "get",
> > > parse
> > > it, write the response form, alter the values as required, send it
> back
> > > by <iq> "set" - it seems to work (except for note about public
> below).
> > >
> > > However, if I don't send presence to the room first (as I need to
> do -
> > > this is why I am using MUC) and I send an <iq> "get" request for the
> > > room config form, the form arrives not as an <iq> "result" but as an
> <x>
> > > element within a normal <message>. If I now parse the form as
> before,
> > > and sent my <iq> "set" command to change the form values.... it
> doesn't
> > > work!! (Though i do get an <iq>  "result" back).
> > >
> > > If I alternatively put the form into a <message> back to the server
> with
> > > the new data in an <x> element (mimicking the format of the server
> > > response), I get the form back with an error 403 "Forbidden".
> > >
> > > So, basically, if I want to create the room using the new config
> forms
> > > _only_, as one can do according to JEP45, it does not seem to work
> as
> > > expected. (According to the JEP, one should get an <iq> "result" not
> a
> > > <message> in response to the <iq> "get" request).
> > >
> > > Hoping to get there eventually!
> > >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Rob Davis" <lists at solarismedia.co.uk>
> > > To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:46 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [JDEV] conference room creation
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi Van
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > I added the following at the start of the returned form as you
> > > > suggested:
> > > >
> > > > <field type="hidden" var="form"><value>config</value></field>
> > > >
> > > > and it responded to the subsequent field value (room name) but, it
> > > > seems, not the rest of the several selected fields.
> > > >
> > > > So it does look as if one needs to return the complete form, or
> > > possibly
> > > > the correct fields in sequence as far as the last field one wants
> to
> > > > alter...
> > > >
> > > > (I was hoping for a shortcut!)
> > > >
> > > > Rob
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Van Gale" <vangale at fastmail.fm>
> > > > To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:14 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [JDEV] conference room creation
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:06:25 -0000, "Rob Davis"
> > > > > <lists at solarismedia.co.uk> said:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am however assuming that:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * MUC doesn't require the complete configuration form back;
> only
> > > the
> > > > > > fields to change
> > > > >
> > > > > This assumption may not be correct.  I haven't tried sending
> back
> > > > partial
> > > > > forms, but...
> > > > >
> > > > > > Any clues?
> > > > >
> > > > > Our client developer had a similar problem that we tracked down
> to
> > > him
> > > > > not returning a hidden field named "config".  (I think that was
> the
> > > > field
> > > > > name... just going from memory here).
> > > > >
> > > > > So, I'm unsure whether sending partial form will work or not,
> but
> > > you
> > > > > certainly need to include the hidden field regardless.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >   Van Gale
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Sutton
> > jid: peregrine at jabber.sys.legend.net.uk
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev