[JDEV] conference room creation with MUC

[Rob Davis]

Hi David

How is the MUC fix coming along?

Here's the version info FYI (sorry about the delay - reasons beyond my
control):

gcc-2.95.3-1c1r4
libc-5.3.12-31

Cheers,

Rob

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Sutton" <jabber at dsutton.legend.uk.com>
To: <jdev at jabber.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 5:30 AM
Subject: Re: [JDEV] conference room creation with MUC


> Hi all,
>
>   I am looking into this whenever I can find a moment - i'm just also
trying to
> fix another issue with MU-Conference at the same time.
>
>   Call for Information:
>
>      Can people let me know what version of GCC and Libc that they
compiled
>      MU-Conference with? I'm testing a theory. Please let me know how
the
>      code is behaving.
>
> Regards,
>
>   David
>
> Quoting Rob Davis <lists at solarismedia.co.uk>:
> >
> > OK - I've written a room config form parser and here's where i've
now
> > got up to:
> >
> > If I create the room by sending presence to it (as with the original
> > group chat protocol) and then request the config form by <iq> "get",
> > parse
> > it, write the response form, alter the values as required, send it
back
> > by <iq> "set" - it seems to work (except for note about public
below).
> >
> > However, if I don't send presence to the room first (as I need to
do -
> > this is why I am using MUC) and I send an <iq> "get" request for the
> > room config form, the form arrives not as an <iq> "result" but as an
<x>
> > element within a normal <message>. If I now parse the form as
before,
> > and sent my <iq> "set" command to change the form values.... it
doesn't
> > work!! (Though i do get an <iq>  "result" back).
> >
> > If I alternatively put the form into a <message> back to the server
with
> > the new data in an <x> element (mimicking the format of the server
> > response), I get the form back with an error 403 "Forbidden".
> >
> > So, basically, if I want to create the room using the new config
forms
> > _only_, as one can do according to JEP45, it does not seem to work
as
> > expected. (According to the JEP, one should get an <iq> "result" not
a
> > <message> in response to the <iq> "get" request).
> >
> > Hoping to get there eventually!
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rob Davis" <lists at solarismedia.co.uk>
> > To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:46 PM
> > Subject: Re: [JDEV] conference room creation
> >
> >
> > > Hi Van
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > I added the following at the start of the returned form as you
> > > suggested:
> > >
> > > <field type="hidden" var="form"><value>config</value></field>
> > >
> > > and it responded to the subsequent field value (room name) but, it
> > > seems, not the rest of the several selected fields.
> > >
> > > So it does look as if one needs to return the complete form, or
> > possibly
> > > the correct fields in sequence as far as the last field one wants
to
> > > alter...
> > >
> > > (I was hoping for a shortcut!)
> > >
> > > Rob
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Van Gale" <vangale at fastmail.fm>
> > > To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:14 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [JDEV] conference room creation
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:06:25 -0000, "Rob Davis"
> > > > <lists at solarismedia.co.uk> said:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am however assuming that:
> > > > >
> > > > > * MUC doesn't require the complete configuration form back;
only
> > the
> > > > > fields to change
> > > >
> > > > This assumption may not be correct.  I haven't tried sending
back
> > > partial
> > > > forms, but...
> > > >
> > > > > Any clues?
> > > >
> > > > Our client developer had a similar problem that we tracked down
to
> > him
> > > > not returning a hidden field named "config".  (I think that was
the
> > > field
> > > > name... just going from memory here).
> > > >
> > > > So, I'm unsure whether sending partial form will work or not,
but
> > you
> > > > certainly need to include the hidden field regardless.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >   Van Gale
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > jdev mailing list
> > > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > jdev mailing list
> > > jdev at jabber.org
> > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> >
>
>
> --
> David Sutton
> jid: peregrine at jabber.sys.legend.net.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev