[JDEV] Creating a presence server component?

[Jean-Louis Seguineau /EXC/TEC]

Well, Ananth to put it bluntly, yes the actual sourceforge distribution of
the Jabberbeans is buggy. I said on this list that we were ready to release
our corrected code, but sofar, haven't been able to create a big enthousiasm
to release the ownership of the sourceforge projecet.
I'll send you a copy of the library if you wish.

Jean-Louis

----- Original Message -----
> Message: 2
> From: "Anantha Krishnan V" <vakrishnan at yifan.net>
> To: <jdev at jabber.org>
> Subject: Re: [JDEV] Creating a presence server component?
> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 12:31:52 +0530
> Reply-To: jdev at jabber.org
>
> Philippe, do you mean the JabberBeans distribution is buggy? I have =
> heard about the Muse API for Jabber. How does it compare with =
> JabberBeans?
>
> Thanks for taking time to help me out.
>
> Regards,
> Ananth.
>   ----- Original Message -----=20
>   From: Philippe Raxhon=20
>   To: jdev at jabber.org=20
>   Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 2:35 PM
>   Subject: Re: [JDEV] Creating a presence server component?
>
>
>   Hi Sylvain and Anantha,
>
>   First of all, Sylvain,when using a presence bcc, it can't hurt the JSM =
>
>   module "mod_presence", it's a blinded carbon copy. But could you be =
> more=20
>   specific when you say:
>   /"I want a standard way to proceed in order to process <message> <iq> =
> in=20
>   a next step. If I create a component with a <presence> element =
> support,=20
>   I wonder whether if a conflict will occur with the JSM module=20
>   "mod_presence"./"
>
>   Anantha, the main issue I had writing a component using jabberbeans is =
>
>   that the code in the latest snapshot is broken for the accept =
> component.=20
>   I had to make modifications to jabberbeans before having a working=20
>   component. I never made modifications to the <browse> or <register>=20
>   sections, my component was for external use only and was not intended =
> to=20
>   interact with the server or the users, not sending anything back.
>
>   I don't forget you and I think the code is on a box I don't use =
> anymore=20
>   but I still can access. I'm pretty sure I can find it. Give me one or=20
>   two days, it's quite hectic for the moment.
>
>   Cheers
>
>   Philippe
>