[JDEV] JabberForge Update

[Julian Missig]

Yeah, I would prefer if we worked more on the Jabber interface to 
JabberForge... and in the process we could come up with some JEPs which 
would be useful for things like JabberForge in general, along with 
getting clients to support some of these things. (headline CVS updates 
would be nice - and I could immediately come up with quite a few things 
to put into an <x> for cvs commits that could be a JEP)

Julian
-- 
email: julian at jabber.org
jabber:julian at jabber.org

Thomas Muldowney wrote:

> Well I guess the gatewaying will stay, but I'm completely against a BBS
> =)  What does that add?  another interface without a common protocol to
> access elements inside it?  No thanks.  Yes it has cool neato factors,
> and I even have a special one running on one of my servers, but i don't
> think it fits the bill here.
> 
> --temas
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 01:25:07PM -0800, ted at acacia.datacomm.com wrote:
> 
>>>>Please keep the mailing lists! I'm on some mozilla-* mailing list, too,
>>>>
>>>What do you think about a "telnet" access for JabberForge? I think it
>>>
>>Yes to both!  Except for SSH instead of telnet.
>>
>>Ted - BBSes? ex 1:105/36...
>>