[JDEV] JabberForge Update

[Thomas Muldowney]

Well I guess the gatewaying will stay, but I'm completely against a BBS
=)  What does that add?  another interface without a common protocol to
access elements inside it?  No thanks.  Yes it has cool neato factors,
and I even have a special one running on one of my servers, but i don't
think it fits the bill here.

--temas


On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 01:25:07PM -0800, ted at acacia.datacomm.com wrote:
> > > Please keep the mailing lists! I'm on some mozilla-* mailing list, too,
> >
> > What do you think about a "telnet" access for JabberForge? I think it
> 
> Yes to both!  Except for SSH instead of telnet.
> 
> Ted - BBSes? ex 1:105/36...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://www.jabber.org/jdev/attachments/20011129/4f49e685/attachment-0002.pgp>