[JDEV] UNSUBSCRIBE

[Richard Torkar]

Don't think so...
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev is the place to go

/Richard


On 27 Jan 2001 10:29:53 -0500, Joe Osowski wrote:
> UNSUBSCRIBE
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdev-admin at jabber.org [mailto:jdev-admin at jabber.org]On Behalf Of
> > Robert Temple
> > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 12:18 PM
> > To: 'jdev at jabber.org'
> > Subject: RE: [JDEV] Cool ICQ style messages - see the typing
> > 
> > 
> > The closest thing to open source that I've been involved with
> > is the old Netrek game, so I don't have knowledge of what open
> > source processes work or not.
> > 
> > It would probably would be very useful to have an active dialog
> > take place on the protocol draft pages.  Perhaps taking place right 
> > on bottom of each the HTML page for each draft.  Something similar
> > to the comments section that appear on the bottom of articles on 
> > slashdot.  Further, it would be infinitely more useful if we 
> > could get an occasional response from the authors of those protocol 
> > drafts.
> > 
> > -Robert
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter at jabber.org]
> > Subject: Re: [JDEV] Cool ICQ style messages - see the typing
> > 
> > Robert Temple wrote:
> > 
> > > Last, you say this is a draft protocol.  Does that mean that this
> > > new feature is something that we can give comments on and
> > > potentially have it modified or refined slightly based on
> > > feedback?  Is there an official process for submitting feedback/
> > > comments that will get to the people coming up with the protocol?
> > > I have tried to send comments Mr. Miller before, but those have
> > > all been ignored :(
> > 
> > Hi, Robert. Yes, feedback is very much welcome. We are working on
> > developing a better process for gathering community feedback with regard
> > to the protocol. Right now the forum for discussion is this list, so
> > you're doing the right thing. :) Before too much longer we hope to
> > something a bit more formal, but right now this list (as well as the
> > jdev discussion room, jdev at conference.jabber.org) are the places to hash
> > out the protocol.
> > 
> > Feedback on the process itself is also welcome. What kind of protocol
> > process would work well? What open-source projects do you think have
> > good feedback processes? We'd like to learn from other projects that are
> > doing things well, so your suggestions are appreciated.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Peter