[JDEV] No More

[Brandon]

Bill,

	These comments were a joke, not meant to be taken seriously!  I hope this 
misunderstaning doesn't cause you to stop using jabber.

Brandon

bill elain wrote:

> This is a post that was just in the discussion room. 
> 
> [18:18] <mass> quiet? quite
> [18:19] <twofriedeggs> you mean no-one's complaining
> about a transport being down? yikes!
> [18:19] <twofriedeggs> :-)
> [18:19] <mass> twofriedeggs: we figured out how to
> solve that problem. Groupchat now filters out those
> messages ;-)
> [18:20] <mickey2> I take it you all do not want to
> hear that then? better to just pat yourselves on the
> back and think all is well
> [18:20] <twofriedeggs> then that'd explain the
> quietness ;)
> [18:21] <mickey2> evidently your interest is not in
> things working, just the illusion, so enjoy your
> illusion then
> [18:21] %% mickey2 has left
> 
> 
> Now I put this here so all would know, why I am
> stating what I am stating.
> I have watched and mostly listening in the room for
> awhile now. Waiting for things to line out and 1.4 to
> get online and transports working. Many have also and
> as it seemed that the time was approaching that this
> might happen, I am I am sure others, have been excited
> about it. I am NOT a developer, what I am is ONE of
> the end users that I THOUGHT, was the purpose of
> Jabber, or at least one of the purposes. For the
> masses to use your IM clients. I now find that perhaps
> is NOT the case.
> I did not realize that my letting the people in the
> know, know that transports were not working correctly,
> was a problem and they did not wish to know these
> things. I do now understand and stand corrected.
> Jabber is not meant,perhaps for those like me, just
> for those who develop it. I was misinformed. So for
> those of you out there who thought you were in some
> small way helping, DON'T it is neither appreciated nor
> wanted as you can see by the post.
> No worries, I will NOT bother you again. 
> Understand, I do not think all the developers are this
> way, but then I didn't think they thought that way at
> all, so who knows. I do know that for me, I will go
> back to another program, and not bother those who are
> working so hard at making sure that all looks good,
> Perhaps one day, it might, but then perhaps it is the
> last thing I seen stated
> . [18:26] * mass prefers to use his illusion
> Kinda speaks for itself doesn't it.
> For you end users, perhaps OMNI would be a good
> choice, it will do the yahoo icq msn and aol, not like
> jabber will, but then perhaps jabber wasn't meant to
> work, just look good and impress some.
>