[JDEV] Re: [Win32-dev] Interface Ad Ins?

[Keith Minkler]

it's definitly an <x/> tag, where x is literaly 'x'.. :)

-----Original Message-----
From: jdev-admin at jabber.org [mailto:jdev-admin at jabber.org]On Behalf Of
Thomas Charron
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 1:13 PM
To: jdev at jabber.org
Subject: Re: [JDEV] Re: [Win32-dev] Interface Ad Ins?


Quoting temas <temas at box5.net>:
> Would it not be better to encapsulate the <ticker> and <symbol> in a <x>
> so=
> =20
> that there NS could be defined per protocol ;-)

  Here we go again.  ;-P

  There is no <x> tag.  The 'x' tag merely represents ANY tag that declares
it's own namespace in a xmlns attribute.  Perhaps I'm translating
incorrectly?
I had understood that the 'X' was merely a representation of any tag that
declares it's own namespace?

---
Thomas Charron
<< Wanted: One decent sig >>
<< Preferably litle used  >>
<< and stored in garage.  ?>>

_______________________________________________
jdev mailing list
jdev at jabber.org
http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev