[JDEV] Re: [Win32-dev] Interface Ad Ins?

[Thomas Charron]

Quoting temas <temas at box5.net>:
> Would it not be better to encapsulate the <ticker> and <symbol> in a <x>
> so=
> =20
> that there NS could be defined per protocol ;-)

  Here we go again.  ;-P

  There is no <x> tag.  The 'x' tag merely represents ANY tag that declares 
it's own namespace in a xmlns attribute.  Perhaps I'm translating incorrectly?  
I had understood that the 'X' was merely a representation of any tag that 
declares it's own namespace?

--- 
Thomas Charron
<< Wanted: One decent sig >>
<< Preferably litle used  >>
<< and stored in garage.  ?>>