[JDEV] A thought on modularity

[Anders Qvist]

I'm working on it now. Will have a patch today if everything works out.

On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Jeremie wrote:

> Yes, the module API nees some revamping... We can address this after we
> get 0.7 development rolling and on the server-dev mailing list(after
> it's created :-)
> 
> Jer
> 
> On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Thomas D. Charron wrote:
> 
> >   Would be better to pass it a pointer to parameters,
> > but that's only my opinion..  This would also allow
> > you to add things to the struct later without breaking
> > the older transports that may not care..  (Well, beyond
> > a recompile for the new struct def..)
> > 
> > ---
> > Thomas Charron
> > 
> > On Mon, 9 Aug 1999 00:37:14    Anders Qvist wrote:
> > >Just had a look at mod_basic and had a thought. All the callback
> > >functions gets a pile of parameters to handle. Wouldn't it be better
> > >if they got a fat struct instead? Apart from making the function def
> > >shorter, it would also mean that the list of stuff that gets sent to
> > >the callback can be added to without breaking older code.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > jdev mailing list
> > jdev at jabber.org
> > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
> 
> 

Anders "Quest" Qvist
NetGuide Scandinavia

-- Why suffer scarcity? Look for the Open Source and enter a world of plenty!