[JDEV] A thought on modularity

[Jeremie]

Yes, the module API nees some revamping... We can address this after we
get 0.7 development rolling and on the server-dev mailing list(after
it's created :-)

Jer

On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Thomas D. Charron wrote:

>   Would be better to pass it a pointer to parameters,
> but that's only my opinion..  This would also allow
> you to add things to the struct later without breaking
> the older transports that may not care..  (Well, beyond
> a recompile for the new struct def..)
> 
> ---
> Thomas Charron
> 
> On Mon, 9 Aug 1999 00:37:14    Anders Qvist wrote:
> >Just had a look at mod_basic and had a thought. All the callback
> >functions gets a pile of parameters to handle. Wouldn't it be better
> >if they got a fat struct instead? Apart from making the function def
> >shorter, it would also mean that the list of stuff that gets sent to
> >the callback can be added to without breaking older code.
> 
> 
> 
> --== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
>