<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im">stpeter@stpeter.im</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> <div class="im">> 2) RFC3921bis-08: "The <show/> element MUST NOT possess any attributes."<br></div><div class="im"> > (also with <status/>, <priority/>, <body/>, <subject/>)<br> ><br> > The latter could be made to state "MUST NOT possess any non-namespaced<br> > attributes".<br> <br> </div>IMHO we don't need to change the schemas for those elements. But it<br> would be clearer to say "there are no attributes defined for these<br> elements".</blockquote></div><div><br></div>I agree - those elements don't allow sub-elements (from the same or other namespaces), so why should they allow attributes?<div><br></div><div>Note that point #2 only applies to the show, status, priority, body, subject elements (not message/presence/iq). Nothing is stopping you from creating 'sibling' elements to these in the same stanza with whatever element and attributes you want.<br clear="all"> <br>-- <br>- Norman Rasmussen<br> - Email: <a href="mailto:norman@rasmussen.co.za">norman@rasmussen.co.za</a><br> - Home page: <a href="http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/">http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/</a><br> </div>