<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [jdev] Facebook XMPP</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Because some people want it. You’ve always complained about it. I’ve always have people request it. At the end of the day, if people want it, I’d rather help them out than argue with you about it.<BR>
<BR>
Daniel<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 5/22/08 2:03 PM, "Sander Devrieze" <<a href="s.devrieze@pandora.be">s.devrieze@pandora.be</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>2008/5/22 Daniel Henninger <<a href="Daniel.Henninger@jivesoftware.com">Daniel.Henninger@jivesoftware.com</a>>:<BR>
> Any reason not to go ahead and add it? I also wouldn't mind seeing:<BR>
> simple<BR>
> sametime<BR>
> ocs<BR>
><BR>
> And hell:<BR>
> xmpp<BR>
><BR>
> Since such a thing does exist. =) I'm actually also using gtalk, but I<BR>
> don't really think that ought to be officially registered. *shrug* =)<BR>
<BR>
Yes, why do you actually have such a transport? AFAICS this only can<BR>
confuse people, or am I wrong and are there good reasons to have it?<BR>
<BR>
--<BR>
Mvg, Sander Devrieze.<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>