Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.actiontec.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see postmaster@actiontec.com for details. Content preview: On Sunday 02 May 2004 7:13 am, Trejkaz Xaoza wrote: > > 2) If there are elements recognized by the client as non-IM (such as IBB > > data or a chat state change), then the client should process the stanza > > in this way. If there are multiple such elements, then only one kind of > > processing should be performed. Which one to choose would be > > implementation specific, but probably picking the first one recognized > > would be fine. End. > > I would say that multiple need to be accounted for in this case, actually, > rather than ignoring further ones. [...] Content analysis details: (6.7 points, 6.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.9 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers 0.4 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML BODY: HTML has unbalanced "html" tags 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.3 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags 0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL RBL: Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org [63.193.241.205 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org] 4.0 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 1.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy [63.193.241.205 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org]