<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
I know the performance will be poor but on the other hand NAT/Firewall is
still a <br>
problem with H.323. Is there any workaround possible without using a H323
gatekeeper/proxy?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Asif Ahsan<br>
<br>
<br>
Matthias Wimmer wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid20030722194440.GA1887@hermes">
<pre wrap="">Hi Asif Ahsan!
Asif Ahsan schrieb am 2003-07-22 10:56:00:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Is there any reference/information availavle for VOIP using Jabber server?
If voice packets are routed through Jabberd will there be significant delay?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Only session initiation should be done by Jabber. You normally won't run
VoIP over TCP ... and even more you don't want to run it over XMPP over
TCP.
Use Jabber for session initiation and an other protocol for the actual
VoIP, e.g. H.323.
Tot kijk
Matthias
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>