<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RE: [JDEV] Question on using NIO with SAX</TITLE> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I agree with your analysis. There are lots of things that need to be done here. Peter had run a poll at Jabbercentral at my request and so far 54% voted for reliable gateways (which is not something Jabber can control) but I have not seen any coordinated advocacy. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>>First of all, I am surprised that there is no Jabber Advocacy mailing list - has one ever been proposed?  Or maybe this is the role of the Jabber Foundation/Council.  Either way, it doesn't seem obvious or grass roots enough.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I would like to see a section on Jabber.org devoted to advocacy. I am willing to sign up on a new mailing list, but the problem is that there seems to be a lack on interest in advocacy in the Jabber community. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>What we need is a group of people to step up and say I am interested in Jabber advocacy. That's the first step. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Regards,<BR>Ashvil</FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>