<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RE: [JDEV] Question on using NIO with SAX</TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.3315.2870" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Can someone tell me if there is any organised
Jabber advocacy?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>[Long rant follows]</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I get the feeling that Jabber is a
great standard with way less publicity than it deserves. I can see
the day where Microsoft wins the IM wars in the same way as they won the browser
wars, and Jabber lives on as nothing more than a niche product for the rest of
its life.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Back before AOL started blocking Jabber servers,
the mentality was that Jabber was for us - we were right because we ran Jabber -
less educated users ran AIM, but we could still talk to them. This isn't
the case now.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I think there are ways we can work against this,
and maximise the chances for Jabber to flourish, but I'm sure that there are
many I haven't thought of, so I look forward to other peoples ideas.
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Is there anyone out there that is of the mindset
that we shouldn't do anything, and let people judge Jabber on it's technical
merits alone? There is something to be said for the argument that time is
better spent improving Jabber than fighting political battles that we cannot
win, but I believe that without some exposure to Jabber, the public are not even
going to think about it let alone switch to it. Remember, we are working
against MSN Messenger icons on every Windows desktop from XP up; those annoying
AOL ads where the schoolgirl says that she is so pleased she can chat with her
friends since AOL invented Instant Messaging.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>First of all, I am surprised that there is no
Jabber Advocacy mailing list - has one ever been proposed? Or maybe this
is the role of the Jabber Foundation/Council. Either way, it doesn't seem
obvious or grass roots enough.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>How about a Jabber webring? Anything that can
group together all the great websites out there can show that there is a
significant community behind Jabber, and it is more than the sum of all its
parts. Is there a way we can set up a Jabber ad server, so we can promote
each others products on our websites?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Corporate Support. It's good to see companies
like Jabber Inc out there, as it give the technology a corporate farce, but lets
face it - Jabber Inc doesn't have much in the way of industry muscle. What
are the chances of getting some major companies involved? From what I can
tell, the only major player that is showing any support is IBM, which is
strange, because Jabber is (at least in part) directly competing against its
Lotus Sametime product. What about seeing if Apple could be convinced to
place an icon on the next MacOS desktop. Redhat should be a sure
bet. Putting an icon to a Linux client on every desktop install of Redhat
would increase our userbase and give Redhat a feature that they appear to be
lacking when compared to Microsoft's offering. The same should be true for
any other Linux distributions, but I have yet to hear of one such company that
is even running a Jabber server yet. Also, there are other companies -
Sun, Palm, Nokia, Sony, etc that make platforms that could benefit from
Jabber. Then there are web based companies - all the free mail providers
that could use an offering similar to MSN Messenger that Hotmail is offering;
Portal services etc. The list goes on.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Media coverage. All the stories about AOL
blocking MS, IM wars and even interoperability stories - Jabber is almost never
mentioned. Jabber Inc do a good job with their press releases, but there
has to be a way to make the media more aware of what Jabber is, and what it does
(and why)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>IETF. Can someone who understands the inner
workings of the IETF give us a short summary of what process we need to go
though to get Jabber listed as an Internet standard, and an honest estimate of
our chances of succeeding?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>ISP's. The idea behind Jabber is that each ISP can
offer an IM service in the same way they now offer mail and news servers.
Does anyone know of any ISP that is actually doing this? Can we get some
examples of how popular it is? Feedback from the customers? Can
anyone think of any ways to encourage ISP's to offer a Jabber server other than
writing emails? Can anyone provide an example email that we can send to
our local ISP's?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Comments,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Michael</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>JID: <A
href="mailto:zilch@jabber.com">zilch@jabber.com</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></BODY></HTML>