<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2654.45">
<TITLE>RE: [JDEV] Disney Jabber Client</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I'm sorry I missed most of this thread.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> Ben Schumacher write</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > somone else wrote</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > Last I heard, they were having trouble with the s2s setup. </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > Primarily the fact that servers doing dialback would try </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > and contact go.com but their IM is running on im.go.com. </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > The in-ability to reroute the traffic within the Jabber </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > standards without resorting to DNS workarounds had been a </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > bit of a bummer.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> I believe this is not correct, anymore. They are using some sort of </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> redirector on their network to route the packets. When they </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> first brought up the server, it was on im.go.com, but now that its </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> basically live, they have moved everything over to use just go.com and </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> use a layer 4 switch to route the traffic to the correct host. (At </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> least, that is my assumption.)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>We would really love to have the server-to-server stuff running. I thought</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>that we were waiting for the abber.com commercial s2s software to be completed </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>before we could set it up. I know in the past there was some issues with</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Our network setup, but I had thought those were resolved. I'll ask my boss</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>what is going on.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > I think they had the ability to do the technical hack but preferred to </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > try and create an elegant solution rather than rush it. In addition, </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > their primary goal is to provide IM between disney users so s2s isn't </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > the number one priority... My impression is their IM team is very </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > small so most of the effort is going into the disney client.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> I think you're probably right on the issue of the IM team being small, and </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> I know they have tried to get S2S (SCM) working, however, like many other </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> corporate networks, they are worried about potential abuses on their </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> network from external servers. (At least, that is my impression.)</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Team? Its really just me with some parttime design support and the </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Occasional Help from network operations.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Hopefully they'll get S2S (SCM) up and running soon as I think it would add </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> a lot to the Jabber community.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I really hope so too!</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>BTW, its been a while since I've done a release. I'm almost ready to make</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>a new release that will include support for message history SSL the new</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>text-conferencing, etc.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-Robert</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>