<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12"> <TITLE>RE: [JDEV] Relationship with .NET?</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> Can you guys please take this elsewhere unless you are going to give explicit examples of how Jabber development will relate to .NET. Thanks P.S. Just because a company with a lot of money backs something, doesn't mean it is great.  > -----Original Message----- > From: Oliver George [<A HREF="mailto:oliver@littledevil.com.au">mailto:oliver@littledevil.com.au</A>] > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:50 AM > To: jdev@jabber.org > Subject: Re: [JDEV] Relationship with .NET? > > > > > > > >>> I suggest if we as an industry are going to back anything > we back SOAP > >>> and XML and let .NET .DIE > >> > >> > >> Wow, I can honestly say I've never heard such an ignorant > statement in > >> my life.  Let me put the statement in perspective for > people who are not up > >> to par with .NET.. > >> > >> "I suggest if we as an industry are going to back anything > we back small > >> peices of wood made so we can pick our teeth, and LET > TOOTHPICKS DIE.." > >> > >> Shesh.. > >> > > > > Shouldn't that be "sheesh"? Or is that "shush"??? > > > > Oh, and I don't use toothpicks... any chance of letting us > in on how you see > > .NET, SOAP and Jabber developing - sorry to be so slow -:) > > > Heh, just my 2c... the initial posting was enthusiastic and hollow.  > give us an example.  else we cant tell an insightful comment from the > new age of propaganda: 'spamming good technology mail groups'.  Sorry > for the conspiricy theory: i've no doubt .NET will be great else MS > wouldn't back it so hard.  but tell us why. > > > _______________________________________________ > jdev mailing list > jdev@jabber.org > <A HREF="http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev" TARGET="_blank">http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev</A> > </BODY> </HTML>