<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<TITLE></TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.3103.1000" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=034495105-06042001>I
spent some time trying to do rich formatting in XHTML basic, but it wasn't going
the way I hoped. Ran into the same problems you described
below. Instead I turned to using something similar to the
<b><i><u><color value="FFFFFF"> tags you
described.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=034495105-06042001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=034495105-06042001>-Robert</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV align=left class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Jens Alfke
[mailto:jens@mac.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, April 05, 2001 4:46
PM<BR><B>To:</B> jdev@jabber.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> [JDEV] Limitations of
XHTML Basic<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<P>The JPO and JPG say that HTML content in messages should use the "XHTML
Basic" dialect. However, the spec for XHTML Basic includes almost nothing in
the way of visual formatting commands, presumably because cellphones don't
have fonts and colors. (Kind of shortsighted, if you ask me!) So there's no
<b>, no <i>, no <font>. The spec does say that stylesheets
can be used to provide this kind of formatting, which in general I'm in favor
of, but I don't think that my Jabber client should have to be able to parse
stylesheets just so users can use fonts and colors in messages. </P><BR>
<P>Are there actual Jabber clients that can send/receive HTML messages? How
are they handling it? My guess is that they're likely to be ignoring the spec
and just using everyday <b>, <i> ... </P><BR>
<P><B><I><FONT color=#005101 face=Helvetica
size=5>—Jens</FONT></I></B><B><I></I></B><B><I></I></B></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>