[jdev] manifesto 0.4

[Peter Saint-Andre]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/30/13 9:19 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> Ralph Meijer wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> I do want to note, though, that XMPP's STARTTLS is only defined to
> work with TLS, not SSL. Said interoperability issues are basically
> the result of non-compliancy in implementations, and if we are to
> drop interop with the current Google Talk network (which doesn't
> even do non-dialup), I don't see why this should be different.
> 
> 
> 
> Right - I'm hoping this particular case won't impact our goals,
> but other things might.

Yes, they might.

I will note that RFC 3920 was published over 9 years ago and the TLS
1.0 specification was published around the time that the original
jabberd server was released (January 1999). If we can't move beyond
SSLv3 at this point, we have bigger problems.

> Largely, this is the point of the test days - to find out if there
> are going to be any problems.

Correct.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJScTREAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pbTwQAIvlahNiUDpPMJ7Dt5m5IXqm
N5fSR6Te39+V1jkr1uALrAmKBtcgHWSjAzu2F9hzaV83Mt63S+dlTCOYtPClZ1VW
mIKomNZLCOfPs9Upp1OXWPhxovgO6U/wAfR6Vib0j8VmRKbl5Cbsnuv1qkfi8kf5
0NkQE6u8l0R3xjkPK+e1ANzhVQwvzKxKyW78IwMKfP7S4CSwxAfsOTob3ymi09b6
WNzj1nZ0pPFW28GxH02xzlgToNm4LgXrLEb7OFwj3TtuKUmD9MB6/xGBGnk1t6B8
aSH0f7IeMgRZCzFy2FSK80Ha2/cgGns8IbfHDvCJN4H0zWZjQDK+tIgH5N1zcK6F
AZFZ9ovzoFfN9vIpYU8cmA7BgBVDSCuaPs1TbDwM1DkUMCh6I74XczI+U3u9BG4G
sqTTF/KlAEUutGYhqhOEcN4WUcq9QlRNM9A45phcROWYt6mbe3MzWDLIDnDz9Uqf
Nfu6YbwPPbozP+EGqQRTuyctKgy0cC9n0sFq+kWVtXsgmXpUxm2Yjm/LITPNdsOg
YIrNi3/5+UDM6ZSGh9se3c2x6Zc2cqbSpt2+SAQoiY7v1a2MnOqmDUZdU+k4cKa1
P9WEzIS3JgxsreTvADQygRT13wSwpcGfQKC0sGYdf/QcuQFwGe56gU1H4ICgPfKV
YKCyXyYZIn/AyK1dQUHT
=iapV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----