[jdev] Fwd: Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2 security discussion

[Peter Saint-Andre]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Of interest here regarding security terminology...


- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Getting our definitions of encryption straight for the HTTP/2
security discussion
Resent-Date: 	Wed, 20 Nov 2013 21:25:35 +0000
Resent-From: 	ietf-http-wg at w3.org
Date: 	Wed, 20 Nov 2013 13:24:52 -0800
From: 	Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at gmail.com>
To: 	ietf-http-wg at w3.org <ietf-http-wg at w3.org>



Greetings again. Over the past weeks, people are sometimes talking past
each other when they say they want to "always encrypt" HTTP/2 traffic.
In specific, many people have used the term "opportunistic encryption"
in very different ways without knowing it.

To help people at least understand what each other might be saying in
the future, I created a page with some definitions that hopefully
everyone can use. Comments are welcome.

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/encryption-definitons

- --Paul Hoffman


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=Ejp3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----