[jdev] The future of Jabber/XMPP?

[Mathias Ertl]

On 08/27/2010 05:18 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
> Do you have a better solution that doesn't have the issues your
> implementation has? All we want are working specifications, and that's
> what we're aiming to develop.
> 
> The only cries I've heard that PEP doesn't scale seem to be coming
> from folk involved in ejabberd. I'm not sure why that is.

To be fair, Stephen Pendleton claimed earlier in this thread there is a
memory leak in Openfire. Jonathan Schleifer claimed that PEP is not
supported in jabberd1 and jabberd2, the latter still seems to be
maintained?

I don't think the current tone is bringing us anywhere, in any case.

greetings, Mati

-- 
I only read plain text mail! I prefer pgp|gpg signed & encrypted mails!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://www.jabber.org/jdev/attachments/20100827/c24a556e/attachment.pgp>