[jdev] The future of Jabber/XMPP?

[Evgeniy Khramtsov]

27.08.2010 23:14, Remko Tronçon wrote:
>> XEP doesn't forbid such behaviour, as I posted above.
>>      
> Hmm, we need to make it explicit that this is forbidden then. The
> whole reason that PEP exists was to avoid spamming of extended
> presence.
>
> Thanks for pointing out that this wasn't 100% clear in the spec.

Good move, Remko. Now ejabberd will violate your synthetic rules for sure.
I'm completely disappointed in XSF: noone cares about implementations 
feedback anymore, it is much more funny to flame implementation wars 
instead of make all implementations happy.

So we ended from what we started: PEP doesn't scale.

-- 
Regards,
Evgeniy Khramtsov, ProcessOne.
xmpp:xram at jabber.ru.