[jdev] The future of Jabber/XMPP?

[Jonathan Schleifer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Am 10.08.2010 um 19:05 schrieb Tomasz Sterna:

> Dnia 2010-07-10, sob o godzinie 22:33 -0700, Matt Mason pisze:
>> It could be that no updates = stability!
> 
> This is the case with jabberd2.
> It reached stability and I do not touch it unless I have to.
> It is just steadily pumping packets in the background. :-)


Not really, it still has the bugs it had years ago that made me move to ejabberd. And ejabberd still has the bugs that made me move to Prosody :(.

Also, stability in XMPP would only be possible if there would be stability in the protocol ;). A lot changed in the past years.

- --
Jonathan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=npK1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----0