[jdev] Facebook XMPP

[Daniel Henninger]

I'm responded to that question many times in the Ignite Realtime forums.  To date I've never had one confused end user.  Either way, don't use it if you don't like it.

Daniel


On 5/22/08 2:25 PM, "Sander Devrieze" <s.devrieze at pandora.be> wrote:

2008/5/22 Maciek Niedzielski <machekku at uaznia.net>:
> Sander Devrieze wrote:
>>
>> 2008/5/22 Daniel Henninger <Daniel.Henninger at jivesoftware.com>:
>>>
>>> xmpp
>>>
>>> Since such a thing does exist.  =)  I'm actually also using gtalk, but I
>>> don't really think that ought to be officially registered.  *shrug*  =)
>>
>> Yes, why do you actually have such a transport? AFAICS this only can
>> confuse people, or am I wrong and are there good reasons to have it?
>
> That's for poor clients like Coccinella that doesn't support multiple
> accounts ;)

No, that's not what I mean. The Openfire Gateway thing includes a
separate transport instance for Google Talk, besides XMPP. So people
see in the list "XMPP Transport" *and* "Google Talk Transport". I
don't see why it is useful to have this kind of duplication...but
maybe there is a reason for that?

--
Mvg, Sander Devrieze.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.jabber.org/jdev/attachments/20080522/c7e3b3b3/attachment-0002.htm>