[jdev] Presence of type "available" not allowed?

[Maciek Niedzielski]

Remko Tronçon pisze:
>>  1. Modify existing documentation and implementations to a more strict
>>  behavior that would treat values not mentionned in RFC 3921 as illegal.
> 
> most implementations just ignore an unknown type and treat it as
> 'available', which i think is a sensible thing to do.

On the other hand, ignoring undefined type 'invisible' and treating it 
as normal available presence may be considered evil by some people.

-- 
Maciek