[jdev] Do Not Disturb, Directed Presence, etc

[Dave Cridland]

On Tue Jul  1 17:10:14 2008, Jonathan Dickinson wrote:
> I know this goes against the grain of XMPP, but how about making  
> the clients a bit more intelligent. A user would set up states that  
> they can associate with different XMPP states.
> For example (The auto responses must be initiated by the user):
> 
> 
But why do these need to be auto-responses at all, why not presence  
settings?


> On the phone : Away : I am on the phone right now, I will get back  
> to you OR I am on the phone, but nearly done.

<presence><show>away</show><status>On the phone</status></presence>


> In a meeting : DND : I am in a meeting OR I am in a meeting +  
> [suppress messages].

<presence><show>dnd</show><status>In a meeting</status></presence>


> Driving : DND : [suppress messages]

<presence><show>dnd</show><status>Driving</status></presence>



> I am sure you get the idea. I should actually write a list of these  
> ideas down...

I get the idea, I just don't get why.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade