[jdev] Possible inconsistency with roster pushes

[Vinod Panicker]

On 10/26/07, Tomasz Sterna <tomek at xiaoka.com> wrote:
>
> Dnia 26-10-2007, Pt o godzinie 12:32 +0530, Vinod Panicker pisze:
> > I think it makes more sense to say that roster pushes should be sent
> > to "active" resources that have requested the roster.
> > [...]
> > Another case is when a client representing a user resource "a"
> > switches from available to active state [...]
> >
> > WDYAT?
>
> How do you define "active" state?

The state where the resource is bound to a resource id.

> How do you switch to that state from available state?

By sending a presence of type unavailable.

Regards,
Vinod.