[jdev] Question about Jabber principles

[Andrew Plotkin]

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

>> Which of these is most friendly to the Jabber system? We've gotten this
>> far by using existing JEPs, so I have a slight preference to *not*
>> introduce new Jabber protocol. But I'm more interested in figuring out
>> what will work right with existing and future Jabber software.
>
> I'd say a combination of 2 and 3 is best. That is, leave in the wrapper
> element (<invitation/>) so that standard Jabber clients can ignore your
> stuff based on namespace, then lock in the meaning of the data fields
> using JEP-0068 scoping.

Okay, I can see that. Thanks.

--Z

-- 
"And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these were the borogoves..."
*
9/11 did change everything. Since 9/12, the biggest threat to American
society has been the American president. I'd call that a change.