[jdev] ejabberd vs. Wildfire

[Daniel Henninger]

Just curious, but what dot he macromedia flash clients require that  
others do not?  (do you have a copy of the patch somewhere?  I'm  
curious to look at it)

Daniel

On Jan 24, 2006, at 10:40 AM, f.m.gomes at controlrede.com wrote:

>
> Hi Mickaël
>
> Is there a plan to support Macromedia Flash clients in the near  
> future in ejabberd, or shall we continue to apply a patch to the  
> current release? This is my only reason (for now) to try to build  
> ejabberd from sources, but with little success. The use of the  
> ejabberd 1.0.0 installer for 'runtime' only worked really well on  
> Linux Ubuntu Breazy :-) Trying to build from the sources didn't run  
> as well :-(
>
> Keep on the good work!
>
> Best regards
>
> Fernando
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:04:49 +0100, Mickael Remond  
> <mickael.remond at process-one.net> wrote:
>> * Sander Devrieze <s.devrieze at pandora.be> [2006-01-24 15:26:00  
>> +0100]:
>>
>>> Op maandag 23 januari 2006 02:40, schreef Yves Goergen:
>>>> I know, I've already tried to compile the latest Erlang version  
>>>> myself
>>>> but it threw too many errors that nobody could resolve on the  
>>>> ejabberd
>>>> list. So I watched out for a ready-to-use Erlang package, but  
>>>> the only
>>>> one I found is the said version 8 or something. Maybe I could  
>>>> use the
>>>> one that comes with the ejabberd 1.0 binary installer, though.
>>>
>>> The installer do not include the Erlang compiler erlc AFAIK (at  
>>> least
>> not in
>>> 0.9.8). You can try the binaries of Erlang/OTP included in Erlang  
>>> REPOS
>>> ( http://freshmeat.net/projects/repos/ ). I believe that includes  
>>> the
>> Erlang
>>> compiler too.
>>
>> I think the compiler is only required for development. The packaged
>> version include all necessary modules including ODBC. No special need
>> to recompile anything.
>> We aim at keeping things simple :-)
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> -- 
>> Mickaël Rémond
>
>