[jdev] Re: ejabberd vs. Wildfire

[Mickael Remond]

* Remko Troncon <remko at psi-im.org> [2006-01-21 19:46:40 +0100]:

> On 21 Jan 2006, at 19:23, Yves Goergen wrote:
> 
> > I've seen that Wildfire doesn't support
> >Privacy Lists, but as no client supports them as well (especially Psi
> >that I use), that isn't a too big deal
> 
> Actually, that is a pretty big deal IMHO, since it is required by  
> XMPP. Even if no client implements it, many people just set a privacy  
> list using XML, since this is an operation that you don't need to do  
> often. It's a lot worse that clients won't be able to assume that  
> privacy lists are implemented on every modern server (for e.g.  
> invisibility), than to have no clients using it yet.

As Remko says, ejabberd 1.0.0 is an XMPP compliant server.
It also has a lot of nice module included such as good (but not yet
totally complete) pubsub support.
Depending on the load you are planning, ejabberd might make a big
difference as it scale very well and is used in production system to run
really large installation. ejabberd is also very stable.

Regarding the web interface, improvements are planned for ejabberd and
in the short term, we hope to have something very nice to give you.

I hope this helps,

-- 
Mickaël Rémond
 http://www.process-one.net/