JID terminology (was: Re: [jdev] PyMSNt 0.11 release)

[Justin Karneges]

On Friday 17 February 2006 12:58, Norman Rasmussen wrote:
> RFC 3920 and 3921 will disagree with you.  There are multiple
> instances in the specs where something like this is written:
>
> the resource identifier portion of the "full JID" (<node at domain/resource>)
> address for use over that stream is a "full JID" of the form
> <node at domain/resource>.
> stanza whose value is the bare JID (<node at domain>) or the full JID
> (<node at domain/resource>)
> deliver the user's presence stanza to the full JIDs
> (<contact at example.org/resource>)

I don't see how this disagrees with what I wrote.  My point was that 
"barejid=fulljid" is logically false.

Correct: "The bare JID happens to be the same as the JID."

Nonsense: "The bare JID happens to be the same as the full JID."

-Justin