[jdev] MU-Conference returning "Not Found"

[Heiner Wolf]

Hi,

JD could you please check if I am doing something completly stupid?

I dont want any room locking after creation by a <presence/> with or
without enclosed xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#owner'

As a hotfix I commented out these lines. My hope is that it does not
lock any new room. 
file: 
  xdata.c
function: 
  void xdata_room_config(cnr room, cnu user, int new, xmlnode query)
lines: 
  332,333
replaced:
         if(new == 1)
         room->locked = 1;
by:
    /*
         if(new == 1)
         room->locked = 1;
    */

hw
--
Dr. Heiner Wolf
bluehands GmbH & Co.mmunication KG
http://www.bluehands.de/people/hw
+49 (0721) 16108 75
--
Jabber enabled Virtual Presence on the Web: www.lluna.de
Open Source Future History: www.galactic-developments.de




>-----Original Message-----
>From: jdev-bounces at jabber.org [mailto:jdev-bounces at jabber.org]On Behalf
>Of Heiner Wolf
>Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:07 PM
>To: Jabber software development list
>Subject: RE: [jdev] MU-Conference returning "Not Found"
>
>
>Hi,
>
>>Right. If you send a non-MUC enabled presence an unlocked instant room
>>should be created for you if one does not exist. At least that's how I
>>understand it (and how we implemented it as well).
>
>Since I am sending always a MUC-free <presence/>, I suppose 
>the "bug" is
>that "some" unlocked instant rooms are locked accidently. Not as we
>supposed before, that most locked rooms are accidently unlocked.
>Question would then be how the component would "fall" into the room
>locking fork instead of leaving it unlocked-instant?
>
>Is there any way to configure in the config file that only
>unlocked-instant rooms will be created?
>
>I will try to reproduce the case but seems to be difficult. Most of my
>rooms work. Happens only sometimes. 
>
>hw
>--
>Dr. Heiner Wolf
>bluehands GmbH & Co.mmunication KG
>http://www.bluehands.de/people/hw
>+49 (0721) 16108 75
>--
>Jabber enabled Virtual Presence on the Web: www.lluna.de
>Open Source Future History: www.galactic-developments.de
>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: jdev-bounces at jabber.org 
[mailto:jdev-bounces at jabber.org]On Behalf
>Of JD Conley
>Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:06 PM
>To: Jabber software development list
>Subject: RE: [jdev] MU-Conference returning "Not Found"
>
>
>> My goal is very simple: send a <presence/> to create an open room
>where
>> everyone can join.
>> 
>> Maybe the fact that is usally works is a bug.
>
>It sounds like it to me.
>
>> 
>> I was thinking that MUC is backward compatible to GroupChat. 
>If I send
>a
>> <presence/> without any mentioning of MUC, then I should get a room
>> which is not locked until it is configured.
>
>...
>
>> No <x xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/muc'/>, no locking, right?
>
>Right. If you send a non-MUC enabled presence an unlocked instant room
>should be created for you if one does not exist. At least that's how I
>understand it (and how we implemented it as well).
>
>-JD
>