[jdev] Re: Two questions regarding JEP-0124 HTTP Binding

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Ian Paterson wrote:
>> can't the proxy figure out which port to use 
>> via DNS TXT records? Does the client really
>> need to tell the proxy which port to use 
>> or is that task better left up to the proxy?
>> Just asking.
> 
> We went through this discussion in a long thread in June. Here is your
> concluding email:
> 
> https://www.jabber.org/standards-jig/2005-June/007818.html
> 
> Of course we're free to change our minds now. ;-)

Yes, it's all coming back to me now. :-)

Including the host and port still seems fine to me, I'm just not 
convinced it needs to be represented as an xmpp: URI. Why not just 
route="host:port"?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
Jabber Software Foundation
http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://www.jabber.org/jdev/attachments/20051118/72c1cde5/attachment-0002.bin>