[jdev] Re: bytestreams and Psi
Justin Karneges
justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com
Mon Nov 7 15:23:44 CST 2005
On Sunday 06 November 2005 03:10, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Right now I cannot judge if the 'fast' extension is the smartest one.
> The negotiation to avoid race conditions by sending an
> additional [CR] character across the bytestream to indicate its selection
> seems crude. My first impression tells me that host negotiation shall take
> place in the xml stream, but I might be missing something important here.
I suppose selection could have occured over Jabber also. I think the reason I
went with the [CR] is because that's how I did the selection back with DTCP
(jep-46), and it didn't really occur to me to do it over Jabber. However,
sending one byte directly is probably more efficient than a routed <message>
stanza, so I don't have a regret.
-Justin
More information about the JDev
mailing list