[jdev] Re: Is a DirectorLingoconnectiontoJabber.orgfromthewebpossible?
Greg Boulter
gregboulter at hotmail.com
Wed Jan 5 21:28:10 CST 2005
Not sure which version but I can say for sure that Flash and Jabber work
just fine at Dreamhost. The only thing I might mention is that they require
that new accounts be set up from their panel and so you can't create new
accounts from the Jabber client.
Greg
----- Original Message -----
From: "dlb" <civintel at comcast.net>
To: "'Jabber software development list'" <jdev at jabber.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:18 PM
Subject: RE: [jdev] Re: Is a
DirectorLingoconnectiontoJabber.orgfromthewebpossible?
>
> Dan:
>
> You might check-out dreamhost's services -
> https://panel.dreamhost.com/kbase/?area=2661. They offer jabber hosting
> under all of their plans, which start at about $8 USD/m. I'm not sure of
> which server version they're running, not all support flash connections.
But
> from a quick review of their materials it does seem that the HTTP and
Jabber
> servers run under the same domain.
>
> * does anyone known which server dreamhost is running ?
>
> HTH
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdev-bounces at jabber.org [mailto:jdev-bounces at jabber.org] On Behalf
Of
> Peter Saint-Andre
>
>
> In article <0I9V003XC9WMD1 at mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>,
> Dan Plesse <dplesse at optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > Sorry I don't know what an ETA is and I would Jabber you but I have
> > a list off interest things to mention.
>
> ETA = estimated time of arrival
>
> There are two jabber.org instances -- one for the jabber server (it
answers
> to jabber.org) and another for the web server (it answers to
> www.jabber.org). We don't want to run a web server on the machine that
> serves up jabber because we have very little running on that machine (only
> what we need for the jabber service) and it would be bad to run even a
> minimal http server on that machine, at least in the opinion of the
> jabber.org admins. Presumably we could do some fancy iptables stuff or
> front-end redirection based on port numbers etc., but we have not
> implemented such a solution yet and are still investigating how best to
> proceed.
>
> Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
>
More information about the JDev
mailing list