[jdev] Re: JEP for Voice Integration

[Celso Martinho]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

2005 seems to be the year of VoIP and many traditional Telecoms (I can 
speak for Portugal and Europe) are rushing and deploying VoIP solutions 
as fast as they can.

An XMPP/VoIP/Videotelephony integration JEP would be most welcome and 
usefull to avoid proprietary implementations and lack of 
interoperability between future clients.

I antecipate that such JEP can be very complicated, specially when 
dealing with "redundant" protocols like seems to be the case (ie: 
SIMPLE vs XMPP for presence, SIP/TINS/SDP vs XMPP for message 
signaling, and the transport of the media codecs as well).

If anyone is willing to start such an effort let me know, we might be 
able to help to real situations and real products for XMPP/SIP :)

Celso.


On 8/fev/2005, at 23:26, Heiner Wolf wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we just started a thread on the standards-jig that should/could lead to
> a JEP. See "[Standards-JIG] VoIP Jabber". But I won't write a JEP
> without having code, I promise.
>
> hw
> --
> Dr. Klaus H. Wolf
> bluehands GmbH & Co.mmunication KG
> http://www.bluehands.de/people/hw
> +49 (0721) 16108 75
> --
> Jabber enabled Virtual Presence on the Web: http://www.lluna.de/
> Open Source Future History: http://www.galactic-developments.com/
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jdev-bounces at jabber.org [mailto:jdev-bounces at jabber.org]On 
>> Behalf
>> Of Peter Saint-Andre
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 10:39 PM
>> To: jdev at jabber.org
>> Subject: [jdev] Re: JEP for Voice Integration
>>
>>
>> In article <20050131090333.49103.qmail at web30203.mail.mud.yahoo.com>,
>> vijayakumar palaniappan <vijayakumarpl at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a JEP for Voice Integration
>>
>> There will be when you write one. ;-)
>>
>> http://www.jabber.org/jeps/submit.shtml
>>
>> But seriously, it always seems that lot of end users are interested in
>> this, but developers are less interested (judging by the
>> amount of code
>> that's been written or protocol docs that have been contributed). So I
>> continue to doubt how important people really think this is.
>>
>> /psa
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdev mailing list
>> jdev at jabber.org
>> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jdev mailing list
> jdev at jabber.org
> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
>
Celso.

- --
SMTP: celso at co.sapo.pt
XMPP: celso at sapo.pt
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCF7F58A6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCCo1c45dvDs9/WKYRAszYAJwMkxX3Bb0ff3luVFfF4O8H8dsHzwCgiSTU
B/2bwQ2LZcRra0fJubbwOXc=
=Cvz0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----